Abstract
Sexual violence constitutes a major global public health and human rights concern, with particularly high incidence in contexts weakened by conflict, poverty, and social instability. Its consequences are multifaceted, including long-term physical, psychological, social, and economic trauma. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of sexual violence and to assess the response strategies implemented in the urban-rural health zone of Lukonga, in Kasai Central Province. The study was based on a descriptive survey conducted among 153 stakeholders directly involved in the prevention and management of sexual violence. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire administered through face-to-face interviews and analyzed using descriptive statistical methods to estimate frequencies, proportions, and prevalence rates. The findings revealed an overall prevalence of 469.5 cases per 100,000 inhabitants, highlighting a significant public health issue. Forced marriage emerged as the most common form of sexual violence, underscoring the persistent influence of sociocultural norms that disadvantage women and adolescent girls. Adolescents and young women aged 15 to 24 years were identified as the most affected group, confirming their heightened vulnerability. Although medical services are relatively available and standardized protocols exist, limited access to legal support remains a major barrier to a comprehensive and effective response. Furthermore, rape accounted for only 8.5% of reported cases, with a prevalence estimated at 39.9 per 100,000 inhabitants, suggesting substantial underreporting due to stigma and fear of retaliation. These findings underscore the need to strengthen integrated multisectoral approaches grounded in community-based prevention, holistic survivor-centered care, and sustainable transformation of harmful social norms.
References
1. World Health Organization. Clinical guidelines for the management of survivors of sexual violence. Geneva: WHO; 2019.
2. Jewkes R, Willan S, Heise L, Washington L, Shai N, Kerr-Wilson A, et al. Measuring the prevalence of sexual violence: methodological challenges and policy implications. Lancet Glob Health. 2020;8(9):e1150–7. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30205-3.
3. Peterman A, Potts A, O’Donnell M, Thompson K, Shah N, Oertelt-Prigione S, et al. Pandemics and violence against women and children: emerging evidence and policy implications. Washington (DC): Center for Global Development; 2020.
4. Abramsky T, Devries KM, Kiss L, Nakuti J, Kyegombe N, Starmann E, et al. Findings from the SASA! study: a cluster randomized controlled trial to assess the impact of a community mobilization intervention to prevent violence against women and reduce HIV risk in Kampala, Uganda. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6(5):e575–86. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30060-8.
5. Heise L, Manji K. Violence and harassment in the world of work: global framework and public health implications. Geneva: International Labour Organization; 2021.
6. Jewkes R, Gibbs A, Stern E, Willan S. Transforming social norms to prevent sexual violence: lessons from community interventions. Glob Health Action. 2022;15(1):2020947. doi:10.1080/16549716.2021.2020947.
7. World Health Organization. Violence against women prevalence estimates, 2018. Geneva: WHO; 2021.
8. United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). Child marriage: global trends and programmatic responses. New York: UNICEF; 2022.
9. World Health Organization; United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA). Factors associated with child marriage in sub-Saharan Africa: multilevel analyses. J Adolesc Health. 2017;61(4):464–71. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.04.015.
10. United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA). Sexual and gender-based violence: global overview and prevention strategies. New York: UNFPA; 2019.
11. Ouedraogo R, Scott J, et al. Access to justice for survivors of sexual violence in West Africa: challenges and perspectives. Afr J Reprod Health. 2022;26(3):45–56.
12. Mukwege D, Nangini C. Rape with extreme violence: the new pathology in South Kivu, Democratic Republic of Congo. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2019;145(2):168–73. doi:10.1002/ijgo.12802.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Musenga et al.
