Geographic Heterogeneity in Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles of Vibrio cholerae O1 in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: A Comparative Analysis of North Kivu, South Kivu, and Tanganyika Provinces.
PDF (French)

Keywords

Vibrio cholerae
antimicrobial resistance
cholera
Democratic Republic of the Congo
mixed-effects models
spatial heterogeneity

Categories

How to Cite

Geographic Heterogeneity in Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles of Vibrio cholerae O1 in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: A Comparative Analysis of North Kivu, South Kivu, and Tanganyika Provinces. (2026). REVUE DES SCIENCES DE LA SANTE, 5(2), 1096-1109. https://doi.org/10.71004/rss.026.v5.i2.154

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in Vibrio cholerae represents a major threat to cholera control efforts in Africa. However, data on the geographic distribution of AMR patterns in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) remain limited and fragmented. This study aimed to describe the geographic heterogeneity of AMR profiles among V. cholerae O1 isolates from three cholera hotspot provinces in eastern DRC and to identify associated determinants. We conducted a repeated analytical cross-sectional study including 3,676 V. cholerae O1 isolates obtained from 25,421 stool samples collected between 2007 and 2023 by the National Cholera Reference Laboratory in Goma, across three eastern DRC provinces (North Kivu, South Kivu, and Tanganyika). Antimicrobial resistance patterns were analyzed using two complementary approaches: (i) a generalized linear mixed-effects model (GLMM) with a random intercept for health zones to quantify spatial heterogeneity through the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and to test Province × Serotype interactions using likelihood ratio tests; and (ii) Firth’s penalized logistic regression, restricted to the common period 2021–2022, to estimate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for erythromycin resistance while addressing quasi-complete separation. Analyses were performed using R version 4.3.3. Resistance was nearly universal to ampicillin (99.8%), chloramphenicol (100%), cotrimoxazole (100%), and nalidixic acid (99.9%), while no resistance was detected to tetracycline, doxycycline, norfloxacin, or azithromycin. Only erythromycin resistance showed marked geographic heterogeneity, with a clear north-to-south gradient (28.2% in North Kivu, 65.4% in South Kivu, and 86.5% in Tanganyika; p < 0.001) and extreme within-province variability (0–97.9% across health zones). Health zone-level variation accounted for 56.7% of the total variance (ICC = 0.567). After adjustment for temporal effects, geographic differences remained significant, with higher odds of erythromycin resistance in South Kivu (adjusted OR = 1.93; 95% CI: 1.31–2.85; p = 0.001) and Tanganyika (adjusted OR = 4.02; 95% CI: 1.89–9.27; p < 0.001). AMR among V. cholerae in the DRC is characterized by near-universal resistance to historically used antibiotics, while susceptibility to doxycycline and azithromycin remains preserved. The marked geographic gradient in erythromycin resistance, substantial within-province heterogeneity, and significant Province × Serotype interaction highlights the need for surveillance at the health zone level to guide locally adapted cholera treatment strategies.

PDF (French)

References

1. World Health Organization. Global situation report for cholera, 2024. Weekly Epidemiological Record. 2025;100(36):347–364. Geneva: WHO; https://iris.who.int/server/api/core/bitstreams/6df56b 18-44f1-4aa1-a952-93c15808a583/content

2. Bompangue D, Giraudoux P, Handschumacher P, Piarroux M, Sudre B, Ekwanzala M, Kebela I, Piarroux R. Lakes as source of cholera outbreaks, Democratic Republic of Congo. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008 May;14(5):798-800. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1405.071260

3. Ingelbeen B, Hendrickx D, Miwanda B, van der Sande MAB, Mossoko M, Vochten H, et al. Recurrent cholera outbreaks, Democratic Republic of the Congo, 2008–2017. Emerg Infect Dis. 2019;25(5):856-864. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2505.181141

4. Hegde ST, Khan AI, Perez-Saez J, Khan II, Hulse JD, Islam MT, Khan ZH, Ahmed S, Bertuna T, Rashid M, Rashid R, Hossain MZ, Shirin T, Wiens KE, Gurley ES, Bhuiyan TR, Qadri F, Azman AS. Clinical surveillance systems obscure the true cholera infection burden in an endemic region. Nat Med. 2024 Mar;30(3):888-895. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-024-02810-4

5. Leibovici-Weissman Y, Neuberger A, Bitterman R, Sinclair D, Salam MA, Paul M. Antimicrobial drugs for treating cholera. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2014;(6):CD008625. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008625.pub2

6. Thapa Shrestha U, Adhikari N, Maharjan R, Banjara MR, Rijal KR, Basnyat SR, Agrawal VP. Multidrug resistant Vibrio cholerae O1 from clinical and environmental samples in Kathmandu city. BMC Infect Dis. 2015 Feb 27;15:104. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-015-0844-9

7. Foster-Nyarko E, Able-Thomas S, Adade NE, Adade R, Anne JCB, Antwi L, et al. Genomic diversity and antimicrobial resistance of Vibrio cholerae isolates from Africa: a PulseNet Africa initiative using nanopore sequencing to enhance genomic surveillance. MicrobGenom. 2025 Dec;11(12):001586. https://doi.org/10.1099/mgen.0.001586

8. Miwanda B, Moore S, Muyembe JJ, Nguefack-Tsague G, Kabangwa IK, Ndjakani DY, et al. Antimicrobial drug resistance of Vibrio cholerae, Democratic Republic of the Congo. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015;21(5):847-51. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2105.141233

9. Marin MA, Thompson CC, Freitas FS, Fonseca EL, Aboderin AO, Zailani SB, et al. Cholera outbreaks in Nigeria are associated with multidrug resistant atypical El Tor and non-O1/non-O139 Vibrio cholerae. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7(2):e2049. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0002049

10. Valia R, Taviani E, Spagnoletti M, Ceccarelli D, Cappuccinelli P, Colombo MM. Vibrio cholerae O1 epidemic variants in Angola: a retrospective study between 1992 and 2006. Front Microbiol. 2013 Nov 28;4:354. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2013.00354

11. Bundi M, Shah MM, Odoyo E, Kathiiko C, Wandera E, Miring'u G, Guyo S, Langat D, Morita K, Ichinose Y. Characterization of Vibrio cholerae O1 isolates responsible for cholera outbreaks in Kenya between 1975 and 2017. Microbiol Immunol. 2019 Sep;63(9):350-358. https://doi.org/10.1111/1348-0421.12731

12. Bolker BM, Brooks ME, Clark CJ, Geange SW, Poulsen JR, Stevens MHH, et al. Generalized linear mixed models: A practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol. 2009;24(3):127-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2008.10.008

13. Rahbe E, Varon E, Opatowski L, Guillemot D, Guillemot D, et al. Determinants of worldwide antibiotic resistance dynamics across drug-bacterium pairs: a multivariable spatial-temporal analysis using ATLAS. The Lancet Planetary Health. 2023;7(7):e547– e557. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(23)00127-4

14. Kabangwa RKS, Mukuku O, Iyombe JE, Lufulwabo JK, Kandolo DK, Tsongo ZK, Wembonyama SO. Seasonal variation, temporal trends, and factors associated with PCR-confirmed cholera in Goma city and surrounding health zones in Eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo, 2020-2024: a multilevel analysis. Trop Med Health. 2026 Jul 1;54(1):125. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41182-026-01019-0

15. Clopper CJ, Pearson ES. The use of confidence or fiducial limits illustrated in the case of the binomial. Biometrika. 1934;26(4):404-13. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/26.4.404

16. Firth D. Bias reduction of maximum likelihood estimates. Biometrika. 1993;80(1):27-38. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/80.1.27

17. Heinze G, Schemper M. A solution to the problem of separation in logistic regression. Stat Med. 2002;21(16):2409-19. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1047

18. AsosegaKA, Adebanji AO, Abdul-Rahaman A. Application of Hierarchical/Multilevel Models and Quality of Reporting (2010–2020): A Systematic Review. Scientific World Journal. 2024;2024:4658333. https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/4658333

19. Heinze G. A comparative investigation of methods for logistic regression with separated or nearly separated data. Stat Med. 2006;25(24):4216-26. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.2687

20. O'Brien RM. A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Qual Quant. 2007;41(5):673-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-006-9018-6

21. Steyerberg EW, Vergouwe Y. Towards better clinical prediction models: seven steps for development and validation. European Heart Journal. 2014;35(29):1925–1931. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehu207

22. Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw. 2015;67(1):1-48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01

23. Sterne JA, White IR, Carlin JB, Spratt M, Royston P, Kenward MG, et al. Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: potential and pitfalls. BMJ. 2009;338:b2393. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2393

24. Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna (Austria): R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2023. Available from: https://www.R-project.org/

25. Rashed SM, Hasan NA, Alam M, Sadique A, Sultana M, Hoq MM, et al. Vibrio cholerae O1 with reduced susceptibility to ciprofloxacin and azithromycin isolated from a rural coastal area of Bangladesh. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:252. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00252

26. Garbern SC, Chu TC, Yang P, Gainey M, Nasrin S, Kanekar S, et al. Clinical and socio-environmental determinants of multidrug-resistant Vibrio cholerae O1 in older children and adults in Bangladesh. Int J Infect Dis. 2021;105:436-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.102

27. Okeke IN, Laxminarayan R, Bhutta ZA, Duse AG, Jenkins P, O'Brien TF, et al. Antimicrobial resistance in developing countries. Part I: Recent trends and current status. Lancet Infect Dis. 2005;5(8):481-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(05)70189-4

28. Olu OO, Maleghemi S, Olayinka A, Guyo AG, Woldetsadik SF, Ameda IM, et al. Unmasking and tackling the underestimation of the cholera burden in Africa: A viewpoint. PLoS NeglTropDis. 2025;19(6):e0013128. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0013128

29. Global Task Force on Cholera Control (GTFCC). Evaluation de la surveillance du choléra : Document d'orientation provisoire 2024. Genève: GTFCC; 2024. https://www.gtfcc.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04 /gtfcc-assessment-of-cholera-surveillance-fr.pdf

30. Schedwin M, Bisumba Furaha A, Elimian K, King C, Malembaka EB, Yambayamba MK, et al. Facility capacity and provider knowledge for cholera surveillance and diarrhoea case management in cholera hotspots in the Democratic Republic of Congo – a mixed-methods study. Glob Health Action. 2024;17:2317774. https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2024.2317774

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Kabangwa et al.