Technological feasibility, sensory acceptance and microbiological quality of Mutton-Based Sausages
PDF

Mots-clés

Small ruminants
value addition
mutton
beef
sausages
food security
Madagascar

Comment citer

Technological feasibility, sensory acceptance and microbiological quality of Mutton-Based Sausages. (2025). REVUE DES SCIENCES DE LA SANTE, 4(1), 97-102. https://doi.org/10.71004/rss.025.v4.i1.43

Résumé

Small-ruminant farming plays a crucial role in local livelihoods across Madagascar, yet the sector remains dominated by the sale of fresh meat with limited processing. This study aims to enhance food security by transforming small-ruminant products and by-products into value-added foods. Three sausage formulations: mutton, beef, and a mixed beef–mutton blend, were produced using household-scale equipment. Consumer acceptability was assessed through a hedonic test involving 61 untrained participants, while microbiological quality was evaluated using standard laboratory methods. The mixed sausage formulation achieved significantly higher acceptability scores (4.4/5; p < 0.05) than the pure formulations. Beef and mutton sausages were equally appreciated by consumers. All microbiological counts were within acceptable limits, confirming product safety. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of processing mutton into high-quality sausages and highlight opportunities for diversifying small-ruminant products to improve food security in Madagascar. Further studies should explore a broader range of value-added products.

PDF

Références

1. Randriamampianina J. L’élevage de petits ruminants à Madagascar : un créneau porteur [Small ruminant farming in Madagascar: a promising niche]. Antananarivo: Direction des Ressources Animales, Madagascar; 2003.

2. Maminiaina OF, Raliniaina M, Rahaga N, Arsène, Ralambomanana N. Formation sur l’élevage caprin dans le sud de Madagascar [Training on goat farming in southern Madagascar]. 2017. Disponible sur: hal-04505834.

3. Bhat R. Valorization of Agri-Food Wastes and By-Products: Recent Trends, Innovations and Sustainability Challenges. In: Valorization of Agri-Food Wastes and By-Products: Recent Trends, Innovations and Sustainability Challenges. 2021. p. 1–27.

4. Smith J, DuMond E. The Cultural History of Sausages. J Culinary Anthropol. 2017;10(1):23–38.

5. Prache S, Caillat H, Lagriffou G. Diversité dans la filière Petits Ruminants : une source de résilience ? [Diversity in the Small Ruminant Sector: a source of resilience?]. 2007.

6. Tiendrebeogo SCW, Kabore D, Tankoano A, Kabore M, Windnongdo N, Derra A, et al. Comparaison de formulations de saucisse produites en utilisant les épices et ingrédients du Kilishi [Comparison of sausage formulations produced using Kilishi spices and ingredients]. Viandes Prod Carnés. 2021. Disponible sur: https://www.viandesetproduitscarnes.fr/phocadownload/vpc_vol_37/Vol_3733_Comparaison%20_kilishi.pdf

7. Pearson AM, Young RB. Meat and Processed Meat Products. Westport (CT): AVI Publishing Company; 1989.

8. Hamm R. Functional properties of myosins and their role in the meat processing. Meat Sci. 1986;18(1):15–41.

9. Confédération Nationale des Charcutiers-Traiteurs et Traiteurs (CNCT). Charcutiers Traiteurs. Nutrition | CNCT - Charcutiers Traiteurs. Paris: CNCT; 2016. Consulté le 5 juillet 2025. Disponible sur: https://www.linguee.fr/francais-anglais/traduction/disponible+sur+le+site.html

10. Feiner G. Meat Products Handbook: Practical Science and Technology. Cambridge (UK): Woodhead Publishing; 2006.

11. Viande Suisse. Mariner de la viande [Marinating meat]. [Lieu inconnu]: Viande Suisse. Consulté le 4 juillet 2025. Disponible sur: https://viandesuisse.ch/savoir-faire/mariner-de-la-viande

12. Statistics Canada. Household income, labour market status and demographic characteristics (Yearbook). Ottawa (ON): Statistics Canada; 2022. Consulté le 5 juillet 2025. Disponible sur: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/11-627-m/11-627-m2024019-fra.htm

13. Raelinera K. Etude comparative des mortadelles mélangées des unités de charcuterie artisanales semi-industrielles d’Antananarivo : Contribution à l’amélioration de leurs qualités et à l’application des normes [Comparative study of mixed mortadella from artisanal semi-industrial charcuterie units in Antananarivo: Contribution to the improvement of their quality and the application of standards] [Mémoire de Maîtrise]. Antananarivo: École Supérieure des Sciences Agronomiques, Université d’Antananarivo; 2008.

14. Jouvin S. Le Goût des Viandes : Comprendre et Sublimer les Saveurs [The Taste of Meats: Understanding and Enhancing Flavors]. Versailles: Editions Quae; 2018.

15. Prescott J, Young O, O'Neill J. The Effect of Context on the Perception of Flavour. Food Qual Prefer. 2004;15(4):315–20.

16. Bernues A, Olaizola A, Corcoran K. Labelling information demanded by European consumers and relationships with purchasing motives, quality and safety of meat. Meat Sci. 2003;65(3):1095–1106.

Creative Commons License

Ce travail est disponible sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d’Utilisation Commerciale - Partage dans les Mêmes Conditions 4.0 International.

(c) Copyright Gregoire et al 2025