Kinetics of Pathogen Attenuation in Desiccated Fecal Sludge: Establishing Quantitative Time-Based Hygienization Criteria for Safe Agricultural Reclamation.
PDF (French)

Keywords

fecal sludge
hygienization
microbial inactivation
kinetics
agricultural reuse
sanitation safety

How to Cite

Kinetics of Pathogen Attenuation in Desiccated Fecal Sludge: Establishing Quantitative Time-Based Hygienization Criteria for Safe Agricultural Reclamation. (2026). REVUE DES SCIENCES DE LA SANTE, 5(1), 368-377. https://doi.org/10.71004/rss.026.v5.i1.83

Abstract

Fecal sludge hygienization is essential for safe agricultural reuse, particularly within geographic regions where decentralized on-site sanitation infrastructure predominates. While solar drying and subsequent prolonged storage are extensively utilized as economically viable stabilization strategies, quantitative data describing microbial inactivation during drying and storage remain limited. This investigation systematically evaluated the temporal evolution and inactivation kinetics of pivotal microbiological parameters during the hygienization of desiccated fecal sludge over a longitudinal period extending up to twelve months. The study evaluated Escherichia coli, total coliforms, and intestinal enterococci, alongside the qualitative monitoring of Salmonella spp. and the assessment of helminth egg viability as a primary determinant of sanitary safety. Quantitative bacterial surrogates were characterized using first-order decay kinetic models, whereas pathogenic indicators were analyzed through a temporal occurrence framework to determine environmental persistence. The results demonstrate that Escherichia coli exhibited an inactivation rate constant of 0.42 month-1 (R2 = 0.78), necessitating approximately 5.5 and 11.0 months to achieve 90% and 99% reductions, respectively. Total coliform bacteria demonstrated significantly higher environmental resilience, characterized by a lower inactivation rate constant of 0.31 month-1 (R2 = 0.70), indicating a more protracted decay trajectory. While Salmonella spp. were successfully attenuated beyond detection thresholds following extended hygienization, the continued presence of viable helminth eggs corroborates their role as the most conservative sanitary indicator. These findings establish a rigorous scientific basis for the implementation of time-based hygienization criteria, thereby enhancing regulatory guidelines for the sustainable and safe reuse of fecal sludge in the circular economy.

PDF (French)

References

1. Bean, C. L., Hansen, J. J., Margolin, A. B., Balkin, H., Batzer, G., & Widmer, G. (2007). Class B alkaline stabilization to achieve pathogen inactivation. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 4(1), 53–60.

2. Barbieri, G., Gigliucci, F., Brambilla, G., & Morabito, S. (2023). Cross-cutting approach for the characterization of microbial emerging hazards in agriculture settings from circular economy-driven wastewater streams. ACS ES&T Water.

3. Cofie, O., Kone, D., Rothenberger, S., Moser, D., & Zurbrügg, C. (2016). Co-composting of faecal sludge and organic solid waste for agriculture. Journal of Water and Health, 14(3), 456–468.

4. Cookey, P. E., & Peter-Cookey, M. A. (2024). Regenerative sanitation: A conceptual framework towards transforming sanitation service improvement and access expansion. Nigerian Journal of Water, Sanitation and Hygiene Development, 1(1).

5. Crittenden, J. C., Trussell, R. R., Hand, D. W., Howe, K. J., & Tchobanoglous, G. (2012). MWH's water treatment: Principles and design. John Wiley & Sons.

6. Dominguez-Sanchez, T. (2005). Reduction of pathogens in biosolids in Mexico using solar drying beds (Master’s thesis). The University of Arizona. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (Publication No. 1429013).

7. Drechsel, P., Qadir, M., & Wichelns, D. (2015). Wastewater: Economic asset in an urbanizing world. Springer.

8. Feachem, R. G., Bradley, D. J., Hemmes, H., & Mara, D. D. (2010). Sanitation and disease: Health aspects of excreta and wastewater management (Original work published 1983). John Wiley & Sons.

9. Feyera, T., Ruhnke, I., Sharpe, B., Elliott, T., Campbell, D. L. M., & Walkden-Brown, S. W. (2020). Viability and development of Ascaridia galli eggs recovered in artificial media followed by storage under different conditions. Journal of Helminthology, 94, Article e210.

10. Helsel, D. R. (2012). Statistics for censored environmental data using Minitab and R (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

11. Jiménez, B. (2007). Helminth ova removal from wastewater and sludge for agricultural reuse. Water Science and Technology, 55(1–2), 485–493.

12. Jothinathan, H., & Singh, A. P. (2023). Fecal sludge characterization, treatment, and resource recovery options: A state-of-the-art review on fecal sludge management. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30, 119549–119567.

13. Kelova, M. E., Eich-Greatorex, S., & Krogstad, T. (2021). Human excreta as a resource in agriculture – Evaluating the fertilizer potential of different composting and fermentation-derived products. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 175, 105748.

14. Koné, D., Cofie, O., Zurbrügg, C., Zurbrugg, K., & Strauss, M. (2007). Helminth eggs inactivation efficiency by faecal sludge dewatering and co-composting in tropical climates. Water Research, 41(19), 4397–4402.

15. Mills, F., Willetts, J., Evans, B., Carrard, N., & Kohlitz, J. (2020). Costs, climate and contamination: Three drivers for citywide sanitation investment decisions. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 8, Article 130.

16. Rentería-Tamayo, R., Vidriales-Escobar, G., González-Ortega, O., & Alatriste-Mondragón, F. (2020). Mathematical modeling of the mesophilic and thermophilic stages of a composting tubular reactor for sewage sludge sanitization. Waste and Biomass Valorization, 11, 955–966.

17. Steiner, M., Montangero, A., Koné, D., & Strauss, M. (2002). Economic aspects of low-cost faecal sludge management: Estimation of collection, haulage, treatment and disposal/reuse cost (1st draft). Swiss Federal Institute for Environmental Science & Technology (EAWAG), Department of Water and Sanitation in Developing Countries (SANDEC).

18. Stenström, T. A., Seidu, R., Ekane, N., Zurbrügg, C., & Westrell, T. (2011). Microbial exposure and health assessments in sanitation technologies and systems. Stockholm Environment Institute.

19. Strande, L., Ronteltap, M., & Brdjanovic, D. (2014). Faecal sludge management: Systems approach for implementation and operation. IWA Publishing.

20. Strauss, M., & Montangero, A. (2003). Fecal sludge management in developing countries. EAWAG.

21. UN-Water. (2014). The UN-Water global analysis and assessment of sanitation and drinking-water (GLAAS) 2012 report. WHO Press.

22. Walther, B. A., & Ewald, P. W. (2004). Pathogen survival in the external environment and the evolution of virulence. Biological Reviews, 79(4), 849–869.

23. World Health Organization. (2006). WHO guidelines for the safe use of wastewater, excreta and greywater. WHO Press

24. World Health Organization. (2018). Guidelines on sanitation and health. WHO Press.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Xavier et al.