From Participation to Sustainability: Evaluating the Role of a Local Non-Governmental Organization in Improving Community Nutrition in Rural Areas of the Democratic Republic of the Congo
PDF (French)

Keywords

community nutrition
NGOs
food security
empowerment
malnutrition
sustainable development

How to Cite

From Participation to Sustainability: Evaluating the Role of a Local Non-Governmental Organization in Improving Community Nutrition in Rural Areas of the Democratic Republic of the Congo. (2026). REVUE DES SCIENCES DE LA SANTE, 5(1), 222-229. https://doi.org/10.71004/rss.026.v5.i1.70

Abstract

Malnutrition remains a major public health challenge in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, particularly in rural areas. Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) play a crucial complementary role in community-based programs, yet data regarding their effectiveness and sustainability remain scarce. This study evaluated the role of the NGO SOPAM in improving community nutrition in the Lukula Territory, Kongo Central Province, Democratic Republic of the Congo. This was an evaluative qualitative study that employed semi-structured interviews, focus group discussions, and document analysis. Forty participants were purposively selected, including NGO staff members, public sector agents, and representatives of farmers’ associations. Thematic analysis using NVivo was guided by a theoretical framework combining community empowerment, collaborative governance, and sustainable development. The interventions focused on agricultural production, agroforestry, and environmental protection. The participatory approach promoted strong community involvement. However, economic autonomy remained limited, with a persistent dependence on the NGO. Collaborative governance excluded the health sector, which represented a critical gap. Although sustainable practices such as agroforestry and sharecropping emerged, the transfer of skills remained partial, thereby threatening long-term sustainability. The participatory approach adopted by local NGOs may promote social empowerment and sustainable practices. However, achieving lasting impact requires the integration of the health sector, the strengthening of economic autonomy, and the implementation of formalized exit strategies accompanied by effective skills transfer.

PDF (French)

References

1. FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP, WHO. The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2024. Rome: FAO; 2024.

2. Black RE, Victora CG, Walker SP, Bhutta ZA, Christian P, de Onis M, et al. Maternal and child undernutrition and overweight in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet. 2013;382(9890):427-51.

3. FAO. Regional Overview of Food Security and Nutrition – Africa 2024. Accra: FAO; 2024.

4. IPC Global. Acute Food Insecurity Snapshot: July–December 2024. Rome: Integrated Food Security Phase Classification; 2024.

5. Gafa D, Chachu D. Explaining Food Insecurity in Sub-Saharan Africa: The Role of Governance and Institutions. Nairobi: African Economic Research Consortium; 2024.

6. Bhutta ZA, Das JK, Rizvi A, Gaffey MF, Walker N, Horton S, et al. Evidence-based interventions for improvement of maternal and child nutrition: what can be done and at what cost? Lancet. 2013;382[9890):452-77.

7. Ruel MT, Quisumbing AR, Balagamwala M. Nutrition-sensitive agriculture: What have we learned so far? Global Food Security. 2018;17:128-53.

8. Banks N, Hulme D, Edwards M. NGOs, states, and donors revisited: Still too close for comfort? World Development. 2019;121:105-18.

9. Ruel MT, Alderman H. Nutrition-sensitive interventions and programmes: how can they help to accelerate progress in improving maternal and child nutrition? Lancet. 2013;382[9891):536-51.

10. Gillespie S, van den Bold M. Agriculture, food systems, and nutrition: meeting the challenge. Global Challenges. 2017;1(3):1600002.

11. Girard AW, Self JL, McAuliffe C, Olude O. The effects of household food production strategies on the health and nutrition outcomes of women and

young children: a systematic review. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology. 2012;26(s1):205-22.

12. Wallerstein N. What is the evidence on effectiveness of empowerment to improve health? Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2006.

13. Zimmerman MA. Empowerment theory: Psychological, organizational, and community levels of analysis. In: Rappaport J, Seidman E, editors. Handbook of Community Psychology. New York: Springer; 2000. p. 43-63.

14. Prost A, Colbourn T, Seward N, Azad K, Coomarasamy A, Copas A, et al. Women's groups practising participatory learning and action to improve maternal and newborn health in low-resource settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2013;381(9879):1736-1746.

15. Ansell C, Gash A. Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 2008;18(4):543-571.

16. Emerson K, Nabatchi T, Balogh S. An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 2012;22(1):1-29.

17. Ebrahim A, Rangan VK. The governance of social enterprises: Expanding the frontiers of NGO effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal. 2021;64(3):601-27.

18. Ager A, Yu G, Hermosilla S. Mapping the evidence on the sustainability of development interventions in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review. Development Policy Review. 2023;41(2):e12645.

19. United Nations. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. New York: UN; 2015.

20. Patton MQ. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2015.

21. Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Bryman A, Burgess R, editors. Analyzing Qualitative Data. London: Routledge; 1994. p. 173-94.

22. Savoie-Zajc, L. [2011). « La recherche qualitative/interprétative ». Dans T. Karsenti & L. Savoie-Zajc [dir.), La recherche en éducation : étapes et approches [3e éd.). Sherbrooke : Éditions du CRP.

23. Mansuri G, Rao V. Community-based and -driven development: a critical review. World Bank Research Observer. 2019;34[1):1-45.

24. Cornwall A, Brock K. What do buzzwords do for development policy? A critical look at 'participation', 'empowerment' and 'poverty reduction'. Third World Quarterly. 2005;26(7):1043-60.

25. Webb P, Boyd E, de Pee S, Lenters L, Bloem M, Schultink W. Nutrition in emergencies: Do we know what works? Food Policy. 2014;49:33-40.

26. Leroy JL, Ruel M, Habicht JP, Frongillo EA. Using height-for-age differences [HAD) instead of height-for-age z-scores [HAZ) for the meaningful measurement of population-level catch-up in linear growth in children less than 5 years of age. BMC Pediatrics. 2015;15(1):145.

27. WHO. Essential Nutrition Actions: mainstreaming nutrition through the life-course. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019.

28. Kung'u JK, Pendame R, Ndiaye MB, Gerbou E, Zoma RL, Mwangi AM, et al. Integrating nutrition into health systems at community level: Impact evaluation of a community-level nutrition project in Ethiopia, Kenya, and Senegal. Maternal & Child Nutrition. 2018;14(S1):e12456.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Kikaya et al.